tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5023590240909870844.post3475993346576326977..comments2008-02-24T03:44:30.193+08:00jun auzahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14949001210993384627noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5023590240909870844.post-34804047289326647202008-02-24T03:44:00.000+08:002008-02-24T03:44:00.000+08:00I earlier used PCLinuxOS 2007, but was lately facing a lot of problems with it, so I decided to ditch it and try out the new MiniME.<BR/><BR/>There isn't much of a difference in the 2007, and 2008 MiniME edition, but the advantage is that you get a clean and basic KDE installation which is free of all useless tools, so you can install only the packages you want. This makes it more of a 'your own distro' and makes your environment more productive because you know what you have installed and it's easy to find everything, because you installed it yourself. Moreover, there aren't any useless service running in the background which would slow things down. So I suggest that if you have any experience with Linux, go with the MiniME version instead of 2007, and customise it to a nice tailor fit :D.Apoorv Khatrejahttp://rutsum.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5023590240909870844.post-16109470517641840152008-01-29T23:24:00.000+08:002008-01-29T23:24:00.000+08:00Kubuntu boots fast and it uses a KDE desktop. Great review bro.Johnnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5023590240909870844.post-33783208874094195802008-01-29T21:35:00.000+08:002008-01-29T21:35:00.000+08:00Err... maybe I'm missing something here, but surely the speed difference compared to Fluxbuntu is because Fluxbuntu uses the lightweight Fluxbox window manager while PCLinuxOS uses KDE (even in the MiniMe edition).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com