Distrowar: TinyME vs. Sidux

Posted by jun auza On 11/28/2007
Distrowar: TinyME vs. Sidux - A month has already passed since our last distrowar, so we are at the right moment to bring it on again. This time, two equally capable Linux distributions that I have recently tried and tested will battle it out to determine who has the upper hand.

It’s TinyME against Sidux for today's main event. Now, without further ado, let’s get ready to rumble! It's showtime!


Distrowar Arena (Test Machine Specs):
Board: Intel Corporation D102GGC2
Processor: 3.40 GHz Intel Pentium D
Hard Drive: Samsung 80GB ATA
Memory: 2GB DDR2 RAM
Display: ATI RADEON X1050


Tale of the Tape:

Distro Name: Sidux/ Weight:448MB/ Country Origin:Germany/ Distro Origin:Debian/ Package Mgt.:DEB/ Default Desktop:KDE/ Distrowatch Rank:#23





Distro Name:TinyME/ Weight:199MB/ Country Origin:USA/ Distro Origin:PCLinuxOS/ Package Mgt.:RPM (APT)/ Default Desktop:Openbox /Distrowatch Rank:#51




Speed Test:
Download Time- Winner, TinyME!
Boot/Startup Time - Winner, Sidux!
Responsiveness- Draw!

Decoding:
Obviously, TinyME is the winner in the “Download Time” category because of its smaller-sized installer. I consider it a plus for a distro that has lesser size and hence can be completely downloaded in lesser time also. Sidux boots surprisingly faster than TinyME, but only around 8 seconds separated their startup time speed. It’s a tie for “Responsiveness” because they were both quick performers.


Aesthetics:
Default Theme- Winner, Sidux!
Extras- Winner, Sidux!
Artwork- Winner, Sidux!

Decoding:
For "Aesthetics", it is really hard to decide because they both look good. Nevertheless, Sidux seems to have a slight edge against TinyME in every "Aesthetics" sub-category so I made it the winner.


Features:
Pre-installed Applications- TinyME!
Available Packages from Repo- TinyME!
Ease of Use- Winner, TinyME!

Decoding:
I have to give it all to TinyME for the “Features” category for the following reasons; it has better line-up of pre-installed software applications and utilities, it has more available software packages from its repositories, and it is relatively easier to use compared to Sidux.


Stability:
Hardware Detection- Draw!
Software Maintenance- Draw!
Error Handling- Draw!

Decoding:
They both performed smooth and steady on my test machine. Accordingly, I can only give a draw verdict for the “Stability” category. Also, I know that an extensive use is required for me to accurately judge their constancy. So, I will just leave it to those that may have used Sidux and TinyME for a much longer period of time than I had and can precisely compare which is more stable among the two.


Final Score:
Sidux = 4
TinyME = 4
*Draw!


Conclusion:
For the first time ever in the history of distrowar, we have a tie. This only means that Sidux and TinyME may differ in strengths and weaknesses, but in the end, they are in the same way competent.

As always, let me remind you that distrowar is just for the spirit of fun and should not be taken seriously. However, you can always take it seriously if you want to. :)

Bookmark and Share

Related Posts:



Archive


"Action is the real measure of intelligence" ~Napoleon Hill

Twitter

Tumblr

Google +